Portrait of Dr. Gachet, by Vincent van Gogh,
public domain
|
Identifying the websites with the most accurate and relevant
information are critical skills that are necessary for navigating our way in
the digital information jungle, but unfortunately, these skills are rarely
taught. In most cases, inaccurate or irrelevant information on the internet
merely delays us for a few minutes until we do find the answer to what we are
looking for. However, when it comes to medical information, inaccurate or
irrelevant information could potentially have a major detrimental impact on our
well-being. Patients and their family members are increasingly using the
internet as a major source of advice regarding their illnesses, treatment
options, dietary advice and disease prevention.
However, little is known about
the accuracy of medical advice obtained via the internet. A study entitled
“Safe Infant Sleep Recommendations on the Internet: Let’s Google It” by Dr.
Rachel Moon and colleagues (published online in the Journal of Pediatrics on
August 2, 2012) addresses this question by focusing on the question of sleep
safety in infants. The American
Academy of Pediatrics
(AAP) has published guidelines for reducing the risk of sudden infant death
syndrome (SIDS), suffocation or other accidental sleep-related infant deaths. Since such guidelines are written for clinical
professionals, they often contain medical jargon that cannot be easily
understood by concerned parents that want practical advice regarding how to
ensure the sleep safety of their infants. Thus, instead of reading the AAP
guidelines, most parents probably enter key phrases related to infant sleep
safety into an internet search engine and may follow the advice displayed on
the sites identified by the search engine.
Google Girls, by Defluiter at Wikimedia Commons
|
Dr. Moon and colleagues tested the accuracy of such websites
by entering thirteen search phrases such as ” Infant sleep position”, ” Infant
co-sleeping” or ” Pacifier sleeping” into the Google search engine, and then
cross-checked the medical information offered in the search results with the
AAP recommendations, which was used as the standard for medical accuracy.
Since most parents would probably read the first few pages
of the Google search results, the researchers only analyzed the first 100
websites identified by each of the thirteen Google searches (total of 1300
websites). Only 43.5% of these 1300 websites contained recommendations that
were in line with the AAP recommendations, while 28.1% contained inaccurate
information and 28.4% of the websites were not medically relevant. The accuracy
was highly dependent on the type of question asked. The search phrase “infant
cigarette smoking”, for example, yielded 82% accurate results, while the search
phrase “infant home monitors” resulted in only 18% accuracy.
Of note, the researchers also categorized the results by the
organization or group that had generated the website. Out of the 1300 websites
identified by the searches, 246 (19%) were retail product review site websites
and 250 (19%) were websites associated with specific companies or interest
groups. Product review retail websites were also the ones which had the lowest
level of medical accuracy (8.5%). On the other hand, government websites and
websites of national organizations (as identified by URL ending in .org) had
the highest level of accuracy (80.9% and 72.5%, respectively).
Surprisingly, educational websites (universities or other
websites with URL’s ending in .edu, ebooks, peer-reviewed articles) only had
50.2% accurate medical information, possibly due to the fact that either some
of the information was not updated or that a number of the linked articles
required a subscription and thus could not be accessed. The majority of the
books found by the search engine either provided outdated or irrelevant
information, which may have also contributed to the low accuracy rate of educational
websites. Blogs and websites of individuals also had very low rates of medical
accuracy (25.7% and 30.3%).
This study highlights the opportunities and pitfalls of
using the internet to communicate medical information. The internet is
providing an opportunity for patients and family members to obtain additional
medical information that they did not receive from their physicians, as well as
to address questions that may arise and do not warrant a visit to a physician.
On the other hand, the study also demonstrates that the quality of medical
information on the internet varies widely. Searches for certain key phrases can
unwittingly lead a user to websites that promote certain products or treatments
without taking the medical evidence and professional guidelines into account.
One key factor to help address this pitfall is for
physicians and other healthcare professionals to actively guide patients or
family members to website that are likely to have information with high levels
of medical accuracy. Instead of placing the burden of discriminating between
accurate and inaccurate information on patients, healthcare professionals could
advise patients or parents as to what websites should be used to address
medical questions that they might have.
Furthermore, government institutions, organizations and
educational websites need to realize the importance of maintaining up-to-date
and accessible medical information on their websites. Concerted efforts between
government or educational institutions, professional organizations and
healthcare professionals are necessary so that patients can maximally benefit
from the information opportunities afforded by the internet.
Chung M, Oden RP, Joyner BL, Sims A, & Moon RY (2012). Safe infant sleep recommendations on the Internet: let's Google it. The Journal of pediatrics, 161 (6), 1080-4 PMID: 22863258
No comments:
Post a Comment