There is quite a bit of debate about the scientific validity of
the proverb “money can’t buy happiness”, because studies on this topic have
yielded discordant results. Some studies support the idea that richer people
are happier on average than poor people, but there are also reports that while
the median income in the US has
grown in recent decades, average happiness among Americans has hardly changed.
Since happiness at a young age could merely reflect the family
environment or family income, the researchers also corrected for this by
directly comparing the happiness of siblings growing up in the same family. It
turned out that the same relationship between happiness at a young age and
higher future income held true. Happier siblings who grew up in the same family
were far more likely to earn more money as adults than their less happy
siblings. The researchers also tried to uncover possible reasons for why
happier adolescents go on to earn more money as adults. Their statistical
analysis found that a higher likelihood of obtaining a college degree, getting
hired and promoted, having an optimistic outlook and being an extrovert were
all possible mediating factors that led to the higher income of happier
children. How the happiness of the younger child impacted these factors could
not be determined and the study also did not provide data on whether happiness
at younger ages was associated with better academic performance.
This was an observational study which evaluated statistical associations, but
could not assess direct cause-effect relationships nor did it test whether an
intervention at a young age can actually make a difference. If we found ways to
help children become happier at age 16 (as a parent, I know that this can be
quite challenging!), would that necessarily mean that they would earn more
money when they grow up? We need more research to definitively answer this
question and then identify the potential interventions that would be effective.
One has to also bear in mind that this study was conducted in US adolescents
and may not apply to other societies or cultures. The fact that extraversion
and optimism were associated with a higher income is a reminder that introverts
often face challenges at work and may lose out in terms of promotions and
earnings to colleagues who exude a lot of optimism and cheerfulness. If this
study had been conducted in other societies where there isn't such peer
pressure to be cheerful and optimistic, the results may have been very
different.
As a society, we should try to maximize the happiness of children,
purely for ethical and altruistic reasons and not because it makes them better
earners. However, we live in an environment where terms such as “fiscal
responsibility” are thrown around as an excuse to cut budgets for schools and
for important educational and community programs. This study provides some data
to show that investing in the happiness of children may indeed be “fiscally
responsible” and yield returns that can be measured in actual dollars.
Image credit: Le bonheur de vivre
(The Joy of Life) by Henri Matisse, 1905. The painting is in the public domain
in the US .
De Neve JE, & Oswald AJ (2012). Estimating the influence of life satisfaction and positive affect on later income using sibling fixed effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (49), 19953-8 PMID: 23169627
I feel that not enough information is provided on the blog. On face value it sounds like being happy as adolescents is associated with higher income as a young adult but, I need to know more about extraneous variables. Did extraneous variables influence theses results? Some questions I have are such as: Did they grow up with two parents that have college degrees? Did the parents have a good income or an income that made them struggle? Did the adolescents grow up in families that had family traditions, shared values and religious affiliation? Has this study ever been replicated? Is this emotional state of happiness related to extraneous variables related to upbringing and family dynamic.
ReplyDeleteThis blog is just a summary of the study and does not contain all the details of the study itself, which consists of 3 tables, as well as 9 tables in the data supplement.
DeleteIt has obviously not been replicated, because it was only published a couple of months ago and it takes years to replicate scientific studies.
As with most observational studies,it relies on the few variables that are assessed in the surveys and cannot answer all possible questions, such as parental education, religiosity, etc. I do not think that one can expect one single study to address all of the questions.
The strength of the study lies in this new approach of reversing the traditional question ("Does money lead to happiness?" and instead asking "Does happiness lead to money?"). The second strength is its inclusion of siblings as controls, because they grew up with the same parents, the same income, the same family traditions, etc. Despite all these commonalities, the happier siblings ended up earning more money.
I have recently been introduced to psychology and just finished reading about the Humanistic Perspective. I feel this study has a lot to do with that perspective because it deals with happiness at a young age and the influence that happiness has on a child at that age. If a child has good relationships and good motivation at a young age they would tend to be more motivated and determined to do well later on in life. Therefore they would work harder to their full potential and earn the higher wages as an adult.
ReplyDeleteI don't necessarily think that money leads to happiness but I do believe having money leads to the opportunity to provide your kids with as much as and advantage to succeed in school and life. As a U.S veteran I do support the idea of trying to understand what the ingredients to happiness are so we can apply this knowledge to people suffering from depression and maybe even PTSD.
ReplyDeleteMost happy kids are socially-connected. That's probably why happy kids are likely to make more money when they become adults.
ReplyDelete